3 ms·
Depending on how you measure it: RSS feeds for updates fit this bill, and they've been around for a decade or more: https://github.com/KDE/ktorrent/blame/3ce105
by Groxx 7y ago
Depending on how you measure it: RSS feeds for updates fit this bill, and they've been around for a decade or more: https://github.com/KDE/ktorrent/blame/3ce105f4d1c3b4c178aaf3d5e84c431508cd6642/ChangeLog#L651 https://github.com/KDE/ktorrent/blame/3ce105f4d1c3b4c178aaf3...
- sneak 7y agoRSS feeds are centralized and rely on web servers and DNS and are thus straightforward to censor or otherwise force offline via government orders, ddos, provider legal threats, et c.
- jude- 7y agoHate to break it to you, but this generally true about Internet infrastructure. IPFS isn't going to fix that. In fact, IPFS, like BitTorrent, is trivial to DDoS by inserting malicious nodes in the DHT in order to block key lookups.
- Groxx 7y agoOr sneakernet-distributed RSS files, or visiting IP addresses directly, or spread over gossip, or replace dns with namecoin... Broadly I agree, but IPNS isn't really part of IPFS, it's an external thing that fakes mutability of another thing that cannot be changed. There are many examples of this kind of thing (e.g. DNS itself, abstracting over IP addresses), with an incredibly wide variety to deal with the various tradeoffs, and IPFS itself not hardcoding a single approach is a good thing. BitTorrent doesn't either, but some tactics have sprung up organically, as has occurred for IPFS (e.g. https://www.increaseo.com/eth-domains-ipfs/ https://www.increaseo.com/eth-domains-ipfs/).