3 ms·
> no incremental compilation Not true, unless you're using an esoteric definition of "incremental". > imports don't support cyclic imports Why on earth would
by sagichmal 7y ago
> no incremental compilation
Not true, unless you're using an esoteric definition of "incremental".
> imports don't support cyclic imports
Why on earth would you consider this bad?
- qtplatypus 7y agoThe problem that I've ran into with the lack of cyclic imports is that I like to arrange the contents of packages logically. However sometimes in order to do this it would result in a circular dependency between two packages. So rather then getting a logical arrangement we have to refactor it into an artificial package to resolve this depenancy.
- sagichmal 7y agoCircular imports are always a design error, no "logical" to it.