4 ms·
Related: Mazda is removing screen from future vehicles due to the clear safety issues. https://www.motorauthority.com/news/1121372_why-mazda-is-purging-touchscr
by ajsharp 7y ago
Related: Mazda is removing screen from future vehicles due to the clear safety issues. https://www.motorauthority.com/news/1121372_why-mazda-is-purging-touchscreens-from-its-vehicles https://www.motorauthority.com/news/1121372_why-mazda-is-pur...
- kart23 7y ago* touchscreen. All US cars still need a screen because of the government required backup camera.
- ghaff 7y agoIs that really true? Some backup camera systems used to display as part of the rearview mirror. (I don't know if the size and nature of the display meets the current requirements though and, in practice, I imagine all but the lowest end vehicles do use a screen for at least some entertainment functions. Big volume knobs are probably mostly a lost cause.)
- Gibbon1 7y agoA technology I see a lot of apparent work on is light field displays which would be perfect for synthetic rear view mirrors.
- kart23 7y agoI just said they need a screen. And to display video you need a screen somewhere, so yeah it's true. And the government does mandate all new cars to have a backup camera monitoring system.
- Tagbert 7y agoYes, but the ones in the mirror are too small. The big, wide angle backup cameras are wonderful. So much better than the limited mirror. They see a much wider area and below the bumper.
- brandonmenc 7y agoThe Mazda puck control is awesome. Hands-down the best car UI. I drive a Mazda and didn't even realize the screen was touchable because there is absolutely no reason to not use the puck. (If you've never seen it, the puck is an all-in-one scroll wheel, button, and directional joystick - on the center console exactly where your arm naturally rests, no reaching necessary.)
- montjoy 7y ago100% agree. This is one of the main reasons why I chose a Mazda over the Honda/Toyota equivalents.