4 ms·
Fwiw, I don't think the Kuhn qualifies as 'unknown'.
by ska 7y ago
Fwiw, I don't think the Kuhn qualifies as 'unknown'.
- number6 7y agoWho is Kuhn?
- sah2ed 7y agoGranted. I must have mentally parsed the “unknown” used by OP as “not widely known” (to the HN crowd), and if you look at a lot of the contributions, many of the authors are not exactly “unknown” either.
- ska 7y agoFair enough. Very specifically I think that book is pretty standard reading for anyone interested in epistemology of science - but that doesn't mean it is generally known. I read the original as looking for books that are good in subject X, but not well known in that subject area.