3 ms·
I can’t read the whole article because of the paywall. But from the lead in it doesn’t look like it really is ‘the same issues’ as in problems with a lack of r
by jonplackett 7y ago
I can’t read the whole article because of the paywall.
But from the lead in it doesn’t look like it really is ‘the same issues’ as in problems with a lack of redundant sensor and overly aggressive correction due to engines that are too big.
Anyone whose read the whole thing care to correct me?
- Pfhreak 7y agoThe sensors and correction are a symptom of the issue at Boeing, which is an aggressive pursuit of profit over safety.
- jonplackett 7y agoThat's not the same as being the same issue. Issue implies something more specific.
- ouid 7y ago> Issue implies something more specific. Why? No it doesn't.
- Pfhreak 7y agoNot at all. The 'issue' could be a technical issue, a cultural issue, a corporate issue, a documentation issue, a legislative issue, a personal issue. If you stop diagnosing when you find a faulty part, you aren't diving deep enough. Ask why some more -- what allowed us to even ship a faulty part in the first place? The sensors in the plane are a faulty technical design, but what systemic issues enabled that faulty design to be shipped at all? Those are the root cause issues.