2 ms·
For tax purposes, you don't want Founder's shares to vest. It's important they are straight shares, for example, to be treated as QSBS and start the 5-year time
by zaroth 7y ago
For tax purposes, you don't want Founder's shares to vest. It's important they are straight shares, for example, to be treated as QSBS and start the 5-year timer on Day 1 so that the first $10 million in equity is tax free if you make a sale.
You can instead add a buy-back provision, which expires in tranches over time (basically this is re-inventing vesting but in reverse).
One real problem I've actually had with such a buyback provision is when the early employee leaves, according to the agreement you are entitled to buy-back 80% of their shares, but then they refuse to cash the buyback check or sign a document agreeing that the shares have indeed been bought back. Now you're back again in this legal limbo.
So next time I do a buy-back provision on Founder's shares, I'm going to pre-fund the whole buyback, and then if they leave, the departing employee will owe the company a partial refund of the buy-back. Since it's Founder's shares at par value, if they refuse to pay it then it's by far the lesser of 2 evils.
E.g. Co-Founder pays $100 par value for shares. Company pays Founder $100 to pre-fund the buyback. Co-Founder leaves after 6 months and Company buys back 8,750 of 10,000 shares. Co-Founder technically owes the company $12.50.