3 ms·
I actually rely on static typing to make architectural code changes. Why I would want to go to dynamic typing is beyond me. My performance/efficiency would gre
by NicoJuicy 7y ago
I actually rely on static typing to make architectural code changes.
Why I would want to go to dynamic typing is beyond me. My performance/efficiency would greatly decrease.
.
The next change I will implement will likely be to not allow null in a property, which can be done in c# 8
- beders 7y agoThe idea is that you wouldn't need large refactorings in more dynamic languages in the first place since you are operating on a different abstraction level.
- iamaelephant 7y agoBest of luck with that.
- simplyinfinity 7y agoIn the JS based project i recently joined (previously i was writing C# ), what i notice is that in a team of 6 people 4 are doing refactorings every sprint for the past 8 months.
- yakshaving_jgt 7y agoNothing about static types nor dynamic types dictate what level of abstraction one must operate on.
- NicoJuicy 7y agoLol, most of refactoring is bad code or not future-proof code. Dynamic typing won't help with that.