24 ms·
It kinda sounds like using UNIX pipes but you would also need a context of global variables and running threads / processes. In my vision the blocks would share
by fierarul 7y ago
It kinda sounds like using UNIX pipes but you would also need a context of global variables and running threads / processes. In my vision the blocks would share memory / variables.
- rakoo 7y agoThat is what the shell script is for: managing the lifetime of said processes, and storing any globals you might need. The real issu with this approach in my opinion is that a stream of bytes is just too generic, and the necessary (de)serialization is going to eat a lot of CPU for not useful task