In the spirit of debate: 1. I wouldn’t call it coddling - going from say 5% chance to a 15% chance 2. I would hazard that the vast majority of legacy admissio

In the spirit of debate: 1. I wouldn’t call it coddling - going from say 5% chance to a 15% chance 2. I would hazard that the vast majority of legacy admissions are perfectly capable students - just as would have trouble telling the difference between the performance of the ~5% of applicants that got in, with the next 5% that didn’t 3. Equality of what?