I am trying really hard to parse what you are saying. Please help. >Commenting to register disappointment at this outcome, but no point in arguing a forgone co

I am trying really hard to parse what you are saying. Please help. >Commenting to register disappointment at this outcome, but no point in arguing a forgone conclusion. Understood. It reads like you really want people to know you own a thesaurus, but register your forgones to your heart's content. >The opportunities this creates will be in how Huh? >to satiate the need for validatiom this new class of burghers. A new class of mid-level paramedieval bureaucracy will be created from the fact that rich kids who don't meet school admissions requirements don't get rich people admissions slots? >Imposter syndrome is a trillion dollar opportunity. Elaborate? >Surely there is some new thing we can invent for them to take pictures of themselves with? Why are you sure? >The author is using the Atlantic to take a victory lap after having infiltrated, destroyed and dsmantled something. How can you dismantle something that has been destroyed? >Their cant deserves scorn. Hypocritical and sanctimonious speech is fine with me. What do you have against cants?