> I originally switched because some years ago, Chrome was being a memory hog, and I remembered using Seamonkey years before that. Same for me a loooong time

> I originally switched because some years ago, Chrome was being a memory hog, and I remembered using Seamonkey years before that. Same for me a loooong time ago, when I found out that running Seamonkey Web browser and e-mail client together used less memory than either of Firefox or Thunderbird alone. After a few years I stopped using it for e-mail, because I had troubles with several specific versions crashing too often, and having all one's eggs in the same basket is not a good idea when one of the eggs rots the others (i.e. a browser crash killing the e-mail client and vice-versa). My parents are still using it for both Web and email, one on Linux, the other on Windows. It is more stable these days. [ posted from Seamonkey, my main browser on Windows and single one on Linux :-) ]