4 ms·
A car that has "self" is equiv to a living being, and it wouldn't be ethical to lock it inside a box. It's not going to happen any time soon and it will never h
by jakeogh 7y ago
A car that has "self" is equiv to a living being, and it wouldn't be ethical to lock it inside a box. It's not going to happen any time soon and it will never happen with conventional binary computing; a non-wetware system capiable of emulating a mouse would melt itself through the road.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22061718 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22061718
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21250424 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21250424
- mprev 7y agoYour framing of the issues seems so far removed from the rest of the discussion that I can only assume I’m misunderstanding your point. Could you elaborate?
- jakeogh 7y agoThe links I provided contain significant context, can you be specific on what is unclear? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21108631 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21108631
- erik_seaberg 7y agoThey sell self-heating canned food. It's not a claim about sapience.
- jakeogh 7y agoThat's the point, I'm arguing that human-level sapience is required. Even if you disagree, set aside the driving part; these machines must correctly interact with real (and adversarial) general intelligences. And really, yes it is used that way in the marketing. It's not accidental. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16620132 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16620132
- smabie 7y agoAre you suggesting that it's immoral to create a self-driving car? I'm not sure what you are talking about...
- jakeogh 7y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21106367 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21106367