3 ms·
>Finally, Bloomberg should be more careful with their word choice. They are prestigious enough to know that __nothing__ is free. There is always a cost(s) inv
by dieselerator 7y ago
>Finally, Bloomberg should be more careful with their word
choice. They are prestigious enough to know that
__nothing__ is free. There is always a cost(s) involved.
The transaction might not call for an exchange of financial
wampum but that does not make it free.
I read the article. It is a synopsis of a paper.
The word "free" does not appear in the article,
and to my reading the author does not imply "free".
- chiefalchemist 7y agoCost zero? That's not free? My point is, free or cost zero...neither exits. There is no free. There is no zero cost. Those are myths. There is always a cost. It might not be tangible (i.e., money) but there is always a cost.