> And that it has been the weapon of choice for school shooters. You know, if it is that difficult to take the time to run a few google searches before saying

> And that it has been the weapon of choice for school shooters. You know, if it is that difficult to take the time to run a few google searches before saying something it might be best to not say it at all. You are demonstrably wrong. I don't understand why people don't take the time to ensure they are working with facts rather than parroting things they heard, or worse, believing things they imagine. Here, I'll help you a little: http://memepoliceman.com/which-kind-of-gun-is-used-most-in-school-shootings/ http://memepoliceman.com/which-kind-of-gun-is-used-most-in-s... https://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/rpt/2013-r-0057.htm https://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/rpt/2013-r-0057.htm https://www.statista.com/statistics/476409/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-weapon-types-used/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/476409/mass-shootings-in... https://www.thetrace.org/rounds/mass-shooting-gun-type-data/ https://www.thetrace.org/rounds/mass-shooting-gun-type-data/ All these shootings are horrible. Yet they have nothing to do with the hardware and everything to do with the software, the brains. The proof of this statement is ridiculously simple: Let's say I gave you a couple of handguns, an AR-15 and as much ammunition and training as necessary to make you a highly capable marksman. After that, how long would it be for you to go out and kill a bunch of people at a mall, on the street or at a school? Never? The problem isn't the hardware, is it?