3 ms·
> It's worth pointing out that Go is a purely mathematical game. You don't need a board at all to play it, especially not if your memory is good enough. Chess G
by majos 7y ago
> It's worth pointing out that Go is a purely mathematical game. You don't need a board at all to play it, especially not if your memory is good enough. Chess Grandmasters don't need boards to play Chess, for example; they can simply say the moves to each other and both will have the same image of the board in their mind.
Is it common to be able to play Go without a board? That seems to require storing 361 bits in your head. I guess it’s much sparser than that for most of the game and has more structure than just 361 random bits, but that still sounds hard.
Here’s a (strong?) amateur who claims to be the only person who can play this way [1].
[1] https://senseis.xmp.net/?BaoYun https://senseis.xmp.net/?BaoYun
- CydeWeys 7y agoWe're talking about hypothetical alien species here. But yes, Go is a purely mathematical game. If you don't have amazing memory you can represent those bits in a computer and it's still the same exact game. The physical board is just a physical representation of Go; it's not an actual relevant part of it (compared with, say, billiards). But yes, there are even some people that can play Go in their head. You're wrong about the amount of information though; each piece on the board has 3 potential states, not just two. Though you can chunk the board pretty effectively and it becomes more about memorizing larger patterns than the state of every single spot on the board. Plus, the board never fills up, so you only need to remember the spaces with pieces in them, not every space.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- sudosysgen 7y agoWell, I'm able to semi reliably play chess without a board and I don't even play a lot, go is a bit over twice the information so it's not that much. Also, 400 bits of information is about two sentences.