3 ms·
Increasing density is precisely what we must do, because the alternative, car-centric kind of living is this close to giving us an expiration date that’s percep
by orhmeh09 7y ago
Increasing density is precisely what we must do, because the alternative, car-centric kind of living is this close to giving us an expiration date that’s perceptibly on the horizon.
- jimmaswell 7y agoI'd rather deal with climate change than have every nice woodsy town turned into Manhattan-lite.
- paddy_m 7y agoTowns are fine, it's suburban sprawl that's the problem. If you like the outdoors and wilderness, you should want more people to live in the city so they don't tarnish the countryside. I would really like to see hunters start getting along with urbanists, they have more in common than they know.
- chillwaves 7y agoThat's easy to say when you are largely insulated by the effects due to wealth, which not coincendentally was derived from an economic system that created the crisis in the first place. That cavalier attitude cannot be adopted by the estimated 300M refugees climate change is projected to create over the next few decades.
- chrischen 7y agoYou don’t have to be manhattan-lite. You can totally be Tokyo-lite instead. Of course one of the main hurdles is America’s race and class problem which caused the segregation and dispersion in the first place.