some feedback for the authors: - some simple 1d plots to illustrate your points would be very illuminating; without them, i'm not very convinced by your argume

some feedback for the authors: - some simple 1d plots to illustrate your points would be very illuminating; without them, i'm not very convinced by your arguments - 'generalization-agnostic' is very frustrating as a term, i'm sure you can think of something clearer - i'm not sure that your argument 'a BNN is only as good as its prior' is any better than 'a NN is only as good as its initialisation', yes any NN model is for sure a victim of local optima, but for most practioners this is good enough