3 ms·
Btw, from my research, the New Yorker article is a little sensationalized. These videos are a better source of information IMO: - https://www.youtube.com/watch
by iongoatb 7y ago
Btw, from my research, the New Yorker article is a little sensationalized.
These videos are a better source of information IMO:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2CLEFocYVw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2CLEFocYVw
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzFYO1EU6rs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzFYO1EU6rs
- hugs 7y agoThose videos include an excellent reminder that statistically, you are very, very likely to survive the initial quake, therefore it's smart to stock up on 2 weeks of food and water, and to take a first aid training class.
- iongoatb 7y agoYes, it's the aftermath that I would be worried about. That and the well-being of your family. What if the quake happened in the middle of the day when the kids were in different schools, the wife was across the bridge in the city, and I was all the way over in Redmond? The destruction would take down cell service, internet, roads, bridges, water lines, electricity - everything to a screeching stop, potentially for WEEKS. That would be catastrophic.