3 ms·
> They tell people to use public transit, but fail to recognize that it takes 2 to 3 hours to get anywhere useful with it. I used to live in Los Angeles (Wests
by atrettel 7y ago
> They tell people to use public transit, but fail to recognize that it takes 2 to 3 hours to get anywhere useful with it.
I used to live in Los Angeles (Westside) and I found this to be true. The bus system has excellent coverage but that often meant that buses stop frequently. A relatively short 7 mile trip could take 35 minutes or more at times. That's 5 minutes per mile, which is a good running pace but a rather poor pace if you must travel a longer distance.
I used the light rail occasionally (the Expo Line) and I too found it underwhelming. The headways were long, often 15 or 30 minutes. The trains had only 2 cars and were often crowded. Heavy rail moves a lot more people much more quickly, with its own right-of-way too. I would have preferred LA going the heavy rail option, but they appear to be mostly investing in light rail (with the exception of the much needed Purple line extension).
- rsynnott 7y agoLight rail can work; many European tram systems are very effective. Needs proper planning, tho. I was amazed by the article saying that a station is under 1k passengers per day. Dublin doesn’t exactly have a well-regarded transport system, but I don’t think any of our tram stops do that few.
- theevilsharpie 7y ago> I used the light rail occasionally (the Expo Line) and I too found it underwhelming. The headways were long, often 15 or 30 minutes. The trains had only 2 cars and were often crowded. This was the case in the past. Expo line trains are now typically 3 cars, and come every 6-12 minutes. It can still get crowded during rush hour, but otherwise has plenty of room.