3 ms·
Seems like it's something to incentivize owners (e.g. Abigail Disney) / founders at the expense of executives? Non-founder executives tend to be somewhat parasi
by ummonk 7y ago
Seems like it's something to incentivize owners (e.g. Abigail Disney) / founders at the expense of executives? Non-founder executives tend to be somewhat parasitic leeches / mba types, so I can't say I'd be unhappy with them getting payed less. That said, this sort of initiative seems to be part of a pattern of poorly thought out attempts to attack "income inequality".
- onetimemanytime 7y agoProbably just another way to raise taxes and bill it as a way to help the poor. Execs usually get a % of the gains during their rein so they re not leeches. Disney can also pay a John Doe with a high school diploma to run Disney for $240K a year. But they'd rather pay $50+ Million for Iger et al because so far if has paid off.