Instead of whining about lack of disclosure, decent journalism would take what info they have and compare it with existing battery tech. And if there's nothing

Instead of whining about lack of disclosure, decent journalism would take what info they have and compare it with existing battery tech. And if there's nothing to say in that vein, don't write the article. I don't have any issue with opinions, or bias, per se, but don't make the whole damn article about your opinion regardless of how valid it is. If this invention is garbage and the press release too, fine, don't write the article. "our battery demonstrated hundreds to thousands of cycles with 80 percent retention of its original capacity" Fine, so given this information, is it (or how much is it) definitely/possibly better than normal production lithium batteries? Maybe someone who didn't want to write the article was forced to? That would explain a lot of journalism these days.