3 ms·
Is the phrase "correctly temporally sequenced" even a necessary phrase? I mean, if you imagine there is a set of them where the "frames" are each at some random
by perl4ever 7y ago
Is the phrase "correctly temporally sequenced" even a necessary phrase? I mean, if you imagine there is a set of them where the "frames" are each at some random point in time or space, then what really changes? It's like if you had a simulation of the universe, the passing of time inside wouldn't have any particular relationship to the passing of time outside because the former is part of what's being simulated.
- goatlover 7y agoSo if you had random sequenced ordering of Boltzmann Brains that add up to the experience of a single life experience, does that collection experience having a life?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- mr_toad 7y agoIf a random stone formation somewhere in the universe happens to look exactly like a statue of Abraham Lincoln, is it a statue of Abraham Lincoln?
- perl4ever 7y agoWhat if there is a meteor shower that happens to leave glowing craters on the moon, that spell out "John 3:16" in a dot matrix manner?
- perl4ever 7y agoActually, more like "if a million random stone formations somewhere in the universe would be a statue of Abraham Lincoln if put together, are they such a statue?"