3 ms·
presumably it may be less because the bundle will contain less patents but that wouldn't be an unreasonable position to take, you are right.
by xal 16y ago
presumably it may be less because the bundle will contain less patents but that wouldn't be an unreasonable position to take, you are right.
- wmf 16y agoIMO it doesn't matter whether VP8 costs one cent or one dollar; if you've already paid for H.264 then even one cent for VP8 is a waste of money. And those who aren't willing to pay (Mozilla and Opera) are not even willing to pay one cent. Historically every new codec has been cheaper (despite containing more technology), so I expect VP8 to be cheaper than H.264, but H.265 may be cheaper still.