3 ms·
> The OSS maintainer should clearly, upfront, preliminarily, outline how do they govern the project Why do you think they owe you this? You didn't pay them, a
by xscott 7y ago
> The OSS maintainer should clearly, upfront, preliminarily, outline how do they govern the project
Why do you think they owe you this? You didn't pay them, and they didn't accept a contract.
- pdimitar 7y agoI don't feel I am owed this at all. I feel only that it's being a good open-source citizen. When you make something that people use and like and want to improve, you should at least have the common decency to tell them beforehand: "this is my show, not gonna accept PRs". I don't think it's such an exhausting job to write two lines at the top of the README.
- xscott 7y agoAppealing to "common decency" is just the same as "being owed". I think you're mincing words to avoid sounding entitled, and I don't think anyone is even entitled to two lines in a README, much less at the top.
- pdimitar 7y agoAll I am doing is saying that it takes very little effort to be upfront and hopefully avoid future confusion. You are free to disagree. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- bloodorange 7y agoI agree that it might help avoid conflict/confusion. I do not, however, agree if you say that they "owe" this to anyone. Their (free software developers') work is already a gift to the world. Take it or leave it. No one is compelled to like it or to take it and use it - doubly so for mission critical stuff.