4 ms·
Really I am sick of the endless hit pieces with definitions so bad that the authors belong in the Hague from dinosaur companies who don't realize the reason the
by Nasrudith 7y ago
Really I am sick of the endless hit pieces with definitions so bad that the authors belong in the Hague from dinosaur companies who don't realize the reason they fell isn't because of some bogeyman but because the problem can be found in the mirror - they are the architects of their own downfall.
Translate the subtitle "Smaller rivals join growing chorus ahead of Congress hearing" sensationalist hit piece into reality and you get captain fucking obvious "Rivals: Please hamper our competitors - to grandstanders interested in maintaining lobbyist money shakedown".
The Basecamp complaint is nonsensical even in the framework of nonsense of Trademarks. If I announce that I am selling Yamaha Jetskis and have the actual product (not a counterfeit) their job is to shut the hell up.
- skrebbel 7y ago> definitions so bad that the authors belong in the Hague As someone from nearby The Hague, um, what does this mean?
- Nasrudith 7y agoIt was an oblique reference to the trials for travesties and torture. Calling offering and promoting store brands monopolistic abuse for instance. Not an implication that the trials are illegitimate or anything like that.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- coldpie 7y ago"The Hague" is used as shorthand for the ICJ.