3 ms·
in my analogy you're the homeless person and the maintainer is the charitable person. in your analogy the homeless person is getting advice from ...? >People w
by throwlaplace 7y ago
in my analogy you're the homeless person and the maintainer is the charitable person. in your analogy the homeless person is getting advice from ...?
>People will still criticize you for being a jerk, as is THEIR right.
completely specious. code in a github repo is not active participation in society. the fact that it's public does not mean it's been submitted for evaluation in any way. criticizing a thing that wasn't critically submitted is meaningless. it's like calling my practice sketches inferior to commissioned pieces - no shit that's the point!
- wgerard 7y ago> in my analogy you're the homeless person and the maintainer is the charitable person. in your analogy the homeless person is getting advice from ...? the maintainer? > completely specious. code in a github repo is not active participation in society. the fact that it's public does not mean it's been submitted for evaluation in any way. criticizing a think that wasn't critically submitted is meaningless. it's like calling my practice sketches inferior to commissioned pieces - no shit that's the point! Uh, what? By packaging something as a crate, by listing it on crates.io, you're submitting it to be used. If you don't want it to be used or evaluated, at all, why in the world would you publish something as a crate on a public registry? This is more like submitting your sketches to a public art gallery and then being upset when the public criticizes it.
- throwlaplace 7y ago>This is more like submitting your sketches to a public art gallery and then being upset when the public criticizes it. that's not what happened. there weren't simply discussions of the viability or soundness or the crate. there were implicit/explicit demands for changes. so your analogy is wrong again - it would be like submitting public sketches and then facing demands that the sketches be improved. does that sound like something that i as the artist should be comfortable with? more importantly does that sound like something a reasonable person would do (make demands for alterations to sketches submitted to a public art gallery)?
- wgerard 7y agowhat are you talking about? The code was submitted to be used by the public as a crate on a public registry. There were ABSOLUTELY discussions of the soundness of the crate - that’s literally what sparked this issue, security flaws in the crate. Are you sure you have a firm grasp on what actually transpired here?
- throwlaplace 7y agoyour belligerence is completely asinine. the part of this discussion that i participated in branches off of this comment >As a maintainer, it is his choice which patches to accept. PRs were made >And then it happens all over again. More unsafe, more patches rejected, that is an implicit/explicit demand that alterations be made. is that not crystal clear to you?
- wgerard 7y agoAnd people are allowed to criticize his reluctance to accept those vital security patches, because he submitted code packaged as a crate to be used by others on a public registry. By publishing something to be used by others in a public registry, you are opting in to receive criticism from the public. Criticism is not the same thing as vitriol and I’m not endorsing the latter even one iota. Is that not crystal clear to you?
- throwlaplace 7y agoman i'm glad there are identifying details about you in your profile so i can avoid working with you. you're moving goal posts because you can't keep track of what's at stake. i'm not going to reiterate because for some reason you're entrenched.
- wgerard 7y agoSounds good.
- 7y ago