44 ms·

>books were written by a person who is falsely claiming his qualifications You seem to be simultaneously agreeing and disagreeing. I refer you to the points, m

• acqq 7y ago
  > there are NO educational and professional qualifications, scientific grounds or any legal regulations required to write these books If some activity is not legally regulated it still doesn‘t mean that uneducated person doing it should be tolerated as he presents himself as an expert. The media which didn’t check these facts are also to be blamed and shamed.
  • 45ure 7y ago
    I feel you are being unnecessarily obtuse. I have expressed my opinion based entirely on the article, but on each occasion, you completely disregard the presented facts, demonstrate your displeasure and produce a reply within a context that does not exist nor does it reflect my views. We have arrived at a point, which is mirroring the predicament of the person in question, so I must respectfully decline to enter into any further debate on this particular topic.
    • acqq 7y ago
      > I feel you are being unnecessarily obtuse. > you completely disregard the presented facts No. If the "fact" is that he can't go to jail or pay a fine in Sweden because he falsely presents himself as an expert, it doesn't mean anybody should support him, or doubt the real expert writing about that. And I still don't understand what's the intention behind your activity here which includes you being rude.