I disagree with the position that even the discussion of the necessity for war, or any active engagements, in the pursuit of solutions to the existential threat

I disagree with the position that even the discussion of the necessity for war, or any active engagements, in the pursuit of solutions to the existential threats posed by climate change are forever off limits. I understand their presence, but as the danger continues to increase, and the solutions so inadequate, directly addressing the root causes — specifically, the apparent necessity to go to physical war against those who seek to destroy humanity — should not be so taboo. But it’s your site. I hope you and your colleagues reconsider this stance, however, at least in regards to this specific issue, especially given its unprecedented importance.