3 ms·
To paraphrase Churchill, Nokia’s deal with Microsoft was the worst strategy they could have come up with, except for all the available alternatives. It’s a par
by sethg 16y ago
To paraphrase Churchill, Nokia’s deal with Microsoft was the worst strategy they could have come up with, except for all the available alternatives. It’s a partnership born out of mutual desperation. Nokia needs an OS that doesn’t suck to develop on (unlike Symbian) and that they can actually ship (unlike Meego). Microsoft needs a revenue stream other than their Windows/Office duopoly. Thus, they need each other.
Why isn’t Nokia going with Android? Because Google doesn’t need anything that Nokia can offer; Google will be happy to count their ad-clicks while Samsung, Motorola, HTC, et al. drive down one another’s profit margins.
(Disclaimer: I work for Nokia and despise Microsoft as much as any self-respecting Linux geek, so I think my biases cancel one another out.)
- TomOfTTB 16y agoIn some ways you are right but as a Nokia employee you should know Nokia's put a decent amount of effort into embracing an "open" philosophy. In fact, the make up and goals of MeeGo are not all that different from Android (Open source OS run by a consortium of companies working to be the defacto standard on all kinds of devices). This marketing push towards openness goes all the way back to the decision to open source Symbian. So for them to now do a 180 and embrace a proprietary operating system from Microsoft flies in the face of everything they'd been selling to their developers