3 ms·
I would assume not being paid for those movies had something to do with it? In February 2008, the Tolkien Trust sued New Line Cinema, the studio behind the Lor
by Ralfp 7y ago
I would assume not being paid for those movies had something to do with it?
In February 2008, the Tolkien Trust sued New Line Cinema, the studio behind the Lord of the Rings trilogy, for £75 million claiming they had not received "even one penny" from the films. A request for punitive damages was denied in September 2008. (In March 2008, New Line Cinema became a unit of Warner Bros. Entertainment.) The case was resolved out of court on 8 September 2009 with the terms not made public.
In a press release, Christopher Tolkien stated, "The Trustees regret that legal action was necessary, but are glad that this dispute has been settled on satisfactory terms that will allow the Tolkien Trust properly to pursue its charitable objectives. The Trustees acknowledge that New Line may now proceed with its proposed films of 'The Hobbit.'"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1578442/JRR-Tolkiens-estate-to-sue-Lord-of-the-Rings-filmmakers-New-Line-Cinema-over-profits.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1578442/JRR-Tolki...
- Pigo 7y agoThat sounds like Hollywood's famous accounting practices. They claim movies that makes 100's of millions have lost money by inflating costs that are paid to production companies and such. I'm sure someone can explain how they get away with it. But it's astounding how they claim these movies lose money, in order to shaft whomever they want.
- Relys 7y agoHonestly, I don't understand how this isn't the same thing as tax fraud.