4 ms·
> If your media is live streamed, it doesn't seem to me likely that you could meet the requirements with an offline system. You store all the PII offline and a
by sadfklsjlkjwt 7y ago
> If your media is live streamed, it doesn't seem to me likely that you could meet the requirements with an offline system.
You store all the PII offline and assign each performer a unique identifier. Then tag each stream with the unique identifier.
Why would that not work?
- dragonwriter 7y ago> Why would that not work? It would work if the law is applied on such a way that the list of media retrieved by querying using the performer ID on the media server is acceptable as the listing of depictions that is required to be part of the age verification records. It's pretty clear in the combination of statute and regulation that either hardcopy or digital records can be used, but it's not at all obvious that a hybrid of that particular form satisfied the requirements. From an information management perspective, I can see it making sense; from what I've seen of administration of legal rules I can see where it might not be. Especially in an industry that politicians (and lead US federal prosecutors are all a brand of politicians) like to score points against, I would expect people to be extremely conservative about uncertain legal exposure; you don't want a setup where you have a decent but uncertain argument of it goes to court, you want one that would never give anyone a reason to think it was a viable pretext for legal action against you in the first place.