3 ms·
2257 was passed well over a decade ago, with minimal public dispute. The only concerning thing is if the models don’t fully understand what the law entails. All
by AJ007 7y ago
2257 was passed well over a decade ago, with minimal public dispute. The only concerning thing is if the models don’t fully understand what the law entails. All affiliate publishers have to have that information under the law.
Also, because of face recognition there really is zero anonymity at this point. It would be very misleading to represent to someone otherwise.
- filmgirlcw 7y agoThe lawyers don’t even understand how the law says data is supposed to be segregated [1], how are the performers supposed to know. Also, there is a very big difference between citing facial recognition tech (which while rapidly becoming more common, is still something that requires a degree of skill to use and has a real cost to using) as a reason for “zero anonymity” and having public records with direct ties to nude photos and videos leaked. It’s even more misleading to represent that these have the same risk profile. [1]: https://lawofsex.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/keeping-your-records-clean-segregating-2257-records-under-federal-law/ https://lawofsex.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/keeping-your-recor...