Rather reinforces my point. Headline: "global forest loss over past 35 years has been more than offset by new forest growth" Replacing the carbon storage of a

Rather reinforces my point. Headline: "global forest loss over past 35 years has been more than offset by new forest growth" Replacing the carbon storage of a single 100 metre mature rain forest meranti, and the diverse ecosystem below it by new growth requires how many square miles? It's a net loss for a century, perhaps more. Overall it's a colossal loss. I note that article accounts for area covered only. No mention of the human activity, of the clear burning, size of trees, amount of other growth under the canopy etc.