10 ms·
The WeLeakInfo.com website is actually seized by the FBI
- X6S1x6Okd1st 7y agoWhat was it before?
- dariusiurca 7y agoA website that sold/publish personal info mostly e-mail/username and password combos.
- d9ve 7y agothey never sold any information, they sold access to view leaked databases with information
- egdod 7y agoThat seems like a distinction without a difference.
- d9ve 7y agothe difference is that selling the information itself is technically illegal, but since these databases were leaked online you're only providing access to view them in a format which isn't necessarily illegal but governments can force their way to shutting them down. next best thing is for WLI or their next counterpart to just crop up a domain in Luxembourg.
- Drakim 7y agoQuick question, who makes that embedded image, the FBI? It has a specific WeLeakInfo logo on it, so it's not just a standard image they can reuse with each domain seizure.
- krapp 7y agoThe background might be a standard template, and they just have someone paste a logo onto another layer. The question I have is why paste it in as a data URL rather than just upload the image to the server, if they control the server?
- dariusiurca 7y agoMaybe they do not control the origin server, only the domain and it would be easier just to redirect everyone using DNS.
- jagged-chisel 7y agoSo the FBI controls the server to which the domain now points ...
- wizzwizz4 7y agoEasier to just have all requests respond with exactly the same HTTP response, or something, based on the requested domain.
- dariusiurca 7y agoThey are not so consistent with what image they use for seized domains but in some cases like this one they use the website's logo.
- dqv 7y agoMy assumption is that it's an exported slide from an FBI powerpoint presentation.
- rootsudo 7y agoHah. That's good.
- ma2rten 7y ago
- jmkni 7y agoInteresting that the Police Service of Northern Ireland are also involved!
- jaycolson 7y agoha! here to comment the same
- systematical 7y agoShouldn't that return an HTTP 451?
- dariusiurca 7y agoTo be honest, it just makes more sense to use a image rather than a HTTP error return for the regular user to see and understand what is going on at the moment with said website.
- nkozyra 7y agoNothing preventing you from doing both.
- mbreedlove 7y agoI've heard that an HTTP 451 is for when a country prohibits your service in their country. Like, if you wanted to access a VPN providers website in a country where they cannot do business, the provider would return a 451 to indicate they are not allowed to serve your request. Have there been other cases where government seized websites return a 451?
- shadowgovt 7y agoI'm wondering when we can expect free speech advocates to decry this abuse of government power in censoring this information.
- JohnFen 7y agoSpeaking for myself as a free speech advocate, this looks to be an appropriate and correct use of government power.
- Someone1234 7y agoYour free speech doesn't extend to someone else's rights. In this case they were selling other people's account credentials to bad actors who wanted to misuse those credentials. "Free speech advocates" should rightfully stay away from defending obviously illegal and immoral behaviour that causes actual harm. There's no abuse of power here; it was rightfully shuttered.
- shadowgovt 7y agoThat argument suggests libraries should pull copies of "The Anarchist's Cookbook", doesn't it? If the misuse is being done by the purchasers, not the broker, why does the broker's site get seized?
- JohnFen 7y agoThe Anarchist's Cookbook was not trafficking in stolen goods. The stolen data may not have been hosted on this site directly, but it was certainly knowingly trafficking the data.
- dgellow 7y agoCollaboration betwen the FBI, Germany's BKA, UK's NCA, and Netherland's KLPD? That's surprising.
- d9ve 7y agoI highly doubt this is an actual seizure. This is the same image they used for their 2018 April Fools prank and faked a domain seizure.
- dariusiurca 7y agoI know :))) But take into consideration that today is not the first of April. This event can also mean that the website was breached or that some admin just made a mistake
- DataAF 7y ago>This is the same image they used for their 2018 April Fools prank and faked a domain seizure. The FBI is seizing domains for April Fools Day pranks? Does anyone else think that's an overreach?
- non-entity 7y agoI think they mean the website put up a fake seizure notice.
- johnnyrockets 7y agoIt actually is not the same image that was used in the April Fools prank. I believe this is either a legitimate seizure, or someone hacked the site. It is far more likely that this is an actual seizure, as their means of contact are all down and their Twitter account is silent.
- blackearl 7y agoI've used them before to lookup my own addresses and see how up to date the passwords. HIBP is great but sometimes you get hits for accounts you never remember making or were made as some one-off forever ago. It's helpful to see what actually got leaked, though obviously there are those using it for nefarious purposes.
- berniemac1234 7y agoshould i be worried that i have used this site
- johnnyrockets 7y agoIf you have used the site for illegal reasons, then you bet your ass you should be worried.
- johnnyrockets 7y agohttps://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/weleakinfocom-domain-name-seized https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/weleakinfocom-domain-name...
- johnnyrockets 7y agoConfirmed by the Justice Department. https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/weleakinfocom-domain-name-seized https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/weleakinfocom-domain-name...