3 ms·
I think it is the other way around, a dynamic system is better at lasting long than a static one. Human bodies are able to regenerate and repair themselves to
by ravingraven 7y ago
I think it is the other way around, a dynamic system is better at lasting long than a static one.
Human bodies are able to regenerate and repair themselves to a certain extend (no single cell in your body will live as long as you). In fact, one of the factors that diminishes our life is a malfunction of our regeneration processes: cancer.
Human body machinery mostly outperforms man-made machinery i.e. there is nor reason to believe that a human heart can beat for ever if we find a way to allow it to regenerate for ever without faults.
Human brains are able to perform medicine which is also a positive feedback loop for how long human bodies can last.
In a nutshell, a dynamic system has a least the chance to reverse or repair damage done to it due to entropy, a static one has not.
- contingencies 7y agoLast sentence added to https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup
- drjesusphd 7y ago> (no single cell in your body will live as long as you) Unless you're a woman who dies before menopause...
- icebraining 7y agoWell, maybe: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/oct/07/evidence-suggests-womens-ovaries-can-grow-new-eggs https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/oct/07/evidence-sug...