4 ms·
I can't believe this passes for reporting. Did anyone contact the BBC for their estimate of the amount they'll save and how? Also, just because the info isn't
by jrwoodruff 16y ago
I can't believe this passes for reporting. Did anyone contact the BBC for their estimate of the amount they'll save and how?
Also, just because the info isn't public does not mean the BBC doesn't have it stored in their own digital archives.
- joeyh 16y agoThe BBC has stored at least some of if in an archive in cooperation with the British Library. I've posted a link to an earlier article; you can find it by browsing some of the "TLDs" they're removing. (BTW, did anyone notice that the BBC calls these sites "TLDs", and that they took a beating for that by people who assumed they were incorrectly referring to "Top Level Domains"? But, TLD can mean "Top Level Directory" too, which is entirely accurate. Most amusing...) Anyway, I think it's good that we're developing a culture where some people care, and make sure that things get archived, even if it's done sometimes unnecessarily, and almost always only gets a degraded copy (ie, a web rip without streaming videos, and without structured data). I only hope that these vigilante actions don't lead companies to not pre-announce massive data erasures.