I agree that BBC should have done something to preserve the content in some form, not necessarily as easily accessible and readable. Heck, they could've packed

I agree that BBC should have done something to preserve the content in some form, not necessarily as easily accessible and readable. Heck, they could've packed it up and put it out as a torrent which they would seed themselves and it would've been better than just dumping it. I upvoted you because I agree about the content, so I can only speculate about downvotes. If I had to guess, I'd say it's probably because you either missed or ignored the point you replied to, which is that the reporting was, indeed, terrible.