3 ms·
In C99 however, you are allowed to do &٭a because when the operand of & is the result of the unary ٭ operator > neither that operator nor the & operator is eva
by edflsafoiewq 7y ago
In C99 however, you are allowed to do &٭a because when the operand of & is the result of the unary ٭ operator
> neither that operator nor the & operator is evaluated and the result is as if both were omitted, except that the constraints on the operators still apply and the result is not an lvalue
- SAI_Peregrinus 7y agoFor anyone who wants it, this is in section 6.5.3.2 Address and indirection operators, paragraph 3.