3 ms·
I'll take the blog re-hash so long as Forbes insists on trying to force me to accept their (compromised once-monthly) ad network, but the effort in digging up a
by eganist 7y ago
I'll take the blog re-hash so long as Forbes insists on trying to force me to accept their (compromised once-monthly) ad network, but the effort in digging up and reposting the link is well-spent generally, so thanks.
(to be clear: if Forbes handled their ads on their own or used ad networks that invest in the security of their platform, I'd actually probably bite the bullet, but if I visit the site on mobile and end up being redirected to another "your phone is infected!" ad exploiting their current provider... I'll keep steering clear without ublock enabled.)
- camiat 7y agohttps://i.imgur.com/dmgV13H.png https://i.imgur.com/dmgV13H.png Image copy of the article for the interested.
- arthurfm 7y agohttps://outline.com/Pxqsdw https://outline.com/Pxqsdw
- soupfordummies 7y agoThank you for saying this and explaining it. I've noticed that a lot with Forbes and a couple other sites. So basically bad actors are hijacking the ad network that Forbes is using because it's a poorly secured ad network. I didn't realize that was what was going on but that explains a great deal.