2 ms·
> Externalities: even though I've read about various ways to store/dispose of nuclear waste long-term, I've yet to hear of a solution that seems clearly safe --
by DarkWiiPlayer 7y ago
> Externalities: even though I've read about various ways to store/dispose of nuclear waste long-term, I've yet to hear of a solution that seems clearly safe -- especially compared to the alternative of not producing nuclear waste in the first place.
Nuclear waste used to be my main reason for not liking nuclear power. The thing is, if you're gonna argue that way, what about CO2? It stays in the atmosphere for far longer, unless we find some good way to actually put it underground again, which atm wejust don't.
The benefit of nuclear waste is that there's far less of it, so putting it underground is actually viable.
And it's not even like renewables don't have their own environmental problems; just look at how many bats and birds are killed by wind turbines.
- pintxo 7y agoSeems there are by several orders of magnitude more birds killed by cats than wind turbines. Birds killed by x in the US annually [1]: - wind turbines: < 570k - Domestic and feral cats: > 210m [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_wind_power#Birds https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_wind_p... They have no comparable numbers for bats, but it seams the industry is working on active counter measures.