3 ms·
That's...a terrible idea. You're now bound to a specific subset of editors that are capable of producing ⇒ (as opposed to the two-character => ), for...for what
by Piskvorrr 7y ago
That's...a terrible idea. You're now bound to a specific subset of editors that are capable of producing ⇒ (as opposed to the two-character => ), for...for what?
For looking pretty, I assume: that's probably a matter of UI (editor displays arrow character instead of equals+greaterThan), but should not propagate into actual source code.