4 ms·
It does not say "due to real estate". How hard is this to read accurately and relate on HN faithfully? I had more upside from SGI's IPO than from valley real es
by BrendanEich 7y ago
It does not say "due to real estate". How hard is this to read accurately and relate on HN faithfully? I had more upside from SGI's IPO than from valley real estate (which was good too, but I never flipped). Yeesh!
- kick 7y agoIt does not say "due to real estate". How hard is this to read accurately and relate on HN faithfully? Sir, the last comment was stating that I was trying to avoid implying that it was due to real estate. > I didn't claim that you were a millionaire because you had invested in real estate > just that you also had invested in real estate I'm not accusing you of getting rich off of real estate. I'm just saying that "investing in real estate" is something that requires a substantial volume of money (as you said, a nest egg): it was a way to show that you were well off, not a way to imply you were a slumlord or something.
- BrendanEich 7y agoI misread your comment, sorry. But I must say real estate was cheap in the ‘80s, especially after downturns. Remember the crash of ‘87 aka Black Monday? Yikes, I’m old.