4 ms·
> It is obvious that the deceased's contributions outweighed their perceived transgressions, else they would have been terminated. Possibly. Another possibilit
by alasdair_ 7y ago
> It is obvious that the deceased's contributions outweighed their perceived transgressions, else they would have been terminated.
Possibly. Another possibility is that no one wanted to be the one to fire a man with terminal cancer who presumably depended upon the health insurance provided by the company.
- phonon 7y agoHe lived in England. Not a factor.
- ghostpepper 7y agoWhy would that matter?
- phonon 7y agoHealth insurance is provided by NHS in England?