16 ms·

>What usually happens is they stick together in foreigner groups for mutual support. Which is why proactive government outreach and support is so important. Wh

>What usually happens is they stick together in foreigner groups for mutual support. Which is why proactive government outreach and support is so important. Why trust-building is important. People need to understand the VASTLY different role police play in Japan, and they need that information communicated in accessible ways. Harsh enforcement degrades that trust and creates insularity. Immigrants provide benefits to the host countries' economies, but rather than use some of that wealth to create and foster social programs, host country politicians instead use these communities as a scapegoat for the anger generated by austerity's impacts on the working poor. Countries want the economic benefits of immigrants without the necessary investment in immigrant communities. >They maintain their culture and continue living by the same rules they are used to. Every person understands theft and the effects it has. This notion that the immigrant or their community is somehow inherently lesser or more tolerant or capable of anti-social behavior is textbook xenophobia.

matheusmoreira 7y ago
> Harsh enforcement degrades that trust and creates insularity. Indeed. It increases the risk associated with being part of that society. I don't know what the correct answer is. > Countries want the economic benefits of immigrants without the necessary investment in immigrant communities. Many immigrants also want the benefits of living in a developed country with a high quality of life without fully integrating into the society that made it possible in the first place. > Every person understands theft and the effects it has. Yes, but the rules and consequences for violating them are not universal. Depending on where they come from, violence may be an acceptable way to resolve conflicts. In some circles, people are immediately held accountable for their actions. In other circles, they might be quietly excluded from a group. > This notion that the immigrant or their community is somehow inherently lesser or more tolerant or capable of anti-social behavior is textbook xenophobia. Not all immigrants will be like this but it is a mistake to simply ignore their background. Every immigrant has the potential to naturalize but it is also important to think about what could happen should they fail to integrate.

matheusmoreira 7y ago

> Harsh enforcement degrades that trust and creates insularity. Indeed. It increases the risk associated with being part of that society. I don't know what the correct answer is. > Countries want the economic benefits of immigrants without the necessary investment in immigrant communities. Many immigrants also want the benefits of living in a developed country with a high quality of life without fully integrating into the society that made it possible in the first place. > Every person understands theft and the effects it has. Yes, but the rules and consequences for violating them are not universal. Depending on where they come from, violence may be an acceptable way to resolve conflicts. In some circles, people are immediately held accountable for their actions. In other circles, they might be quietly excluded from a group. > This notion that the immigrant or their community is somehow inherently lesser or more tolerant or capable of anti-social behavior is textbook xenophobia. Not all immigrants will be like this but it is a mistake to simply ignore their background. Every immigrant has the potential to naturalize but it is also important to think about what could happen should they fail to integrate.