3 ms·
Understandable he had to go. Not many people would feel comfortable supporting a product where the profits go in to restricting their human rights.
by Polylactic_acid 7y ago
Understandable he had to go. Not many people would feel comfortable supporting a product where the profits go in to restricting their human rights.
- core-questions 7y agoThat's an entirely disingenuous way of putting this situation. Mozilla's profits are NOT the salaries of its employees - the profits are AFTER payroll. It was Eich's personal money, not Mozilla's money, and there is absolutely zero implication that Mozilla itself had the same opinions as its CEO - nor should there be. If you draw that inference, it is because you're acting as part of Cancel Culture, which is totalitarian liberalism in action.
- baud147258 7y agoThat's an entirely disingenuous way of putting this situation. Mozilla's profits are NOT the salaries of its employees - the profits are AFTER payroll. It was Eich's personal money, not Mozilla's money, and there is absolutely zero implication that Mozilla itself had the same opinions as its CEO - nor should there be. If you draw that inference, it is because you're acting as part of Cancel Culture, which is totalitarian liberalism in action.