4 ms·
would be interesting to see some AI-assisted version of holacracy replace middle managers -- you'd still have low-level team leads and high-level strategy peopl
by awinter-py 7y ago
would be interesting to see some AI-assisted version of holacracy replace middle managers -- you'd still have low-level team leads and high-level strategy people, but a lot of the informational glue and project updates could be taken over by machines
you'd need to go into a project like that (1) believing that middle managers eventually suppress more value than they add and (2) you're okay operating in a random mix of cowboy team leads and inconsistent organizational glue between them.
you'd set broad parameters like 'don't over-duplicate work', 'pick projects that are more or less on-topic with our company', 'get third party verification of plans and estimates'. Firing could be some mix of 'future needs', performance and random. Moving teams would happen based on an internal market of skills & personnel budget.
might be chaos but it could be fun.
- Matticus_Rex 7y agoI've been really interested to watch what Holacracy actually does (sans AI) in healthy, agile companies. A lot of the management overhead gets cut (while keeping functional management of the company, though a lot of it becomes process rather than people), and a lot of the projected issues are just things someone can propose a solution for and get it enacted via Holacracy governance. Springest is a really interesting example. Very anti-bullshit culture, rigid focus on OKRs and efficiency, and yet they're extremely light-hearted and lack the political crap most similarly high-performing companies have. Maybe AI makes it better in the long run, but I'm a believer already.