3 ms·
I would love it if you added something between full archiving and the basic account. I want the freetext search, but don't need to be able to access the archiv
by buro9 16y ago
I would love it if you added something between full archiving and the basic account.
I want the freetext search, but don't need to be able to access the archived page (except for the equivalent of Google's text cache if the remote page is down).
So yes I want archiving, but I don't need asset archiving for things like the images, css, javascript on the pages. And yes I realise for a lot of hashbang sites this would break, but that's just dandy with me.
I could sign up to the archiving, but with over 1,700 bookmarks I hesitate... will it go and download all of them? I think that's creating a burden on your service so I am not upgrading. I'd even pay the same price, or damn near it, as the full archiving, but I really want to get the fulltext search in a guilt-free way.
- idlewords 16y agoIf you upgrade, we do go fetch all the link content. We have users with 70k+ archived bookmarks, so you'd really be just a drop in the bucket. It comes down to this - storage is cheap and development time is expensive. It would take considerable work to retrofit the crawler to only fetch dependencies for certain users, manage the case where they upgraded/downgraded between levels, and so on.
- buro9 16y agoCool, that makes me feel guilt-free... one upgrade coming.