I'm with you on this. My reason for comment related purely to the looseness of the conversation, w.r.t. the word "scale", which, it seems I had misunderstood t

I'm with you on this. My reason for comment related purely to the looseness of the conversation, w.r.t. the word "scale", which, it seems I had misunderstood to mean an affine transform. In light of this comment, I now see you were talking about some growth function or change in topology/structure. Thanks for the clarification.