3 ms·
The problem isn't the pure math. It's the assumptions and conclusions.
by sabertoothed 7y ago
The problem isn't the pure math. It's the assumptions and conclusions.
- JohnJamesRambo 7y agoBut you are doing the textbook version of ad hominem. We want to know if what they are saying is correct and math can tell us. We don’t need more. >a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive...
- sabertoothed 7y agoI think you are not being intellectually honest here. The headline is "Electricity Shock: Toyota Camry Cheaper To Fuel Than A Tesla Model 3". Then the author assumes the Tesla will always be charged at an (expensive) supercharger. The math checks out (as in: I assume the simple calculations are not incorrect). The author's assumptions/conclusions do not check out. And do not back up the sensationalist (and incorrect) headline. My comment was not ad hominem. Not only because I did not attack a human.