3 ms·
This reminded me of the guys who got a chapter of "Mein Kampf" accepted as a paper. [0] [0] https://web.archive.org/web/20181003015636/https://www.wsj.com/arti
by BurnGpuBurn 7y ago
This reminded me of the guys who got a chapter of "Mein Kampf" accepted as a paper. [0]
[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20181003015636/https://www.wsj.com/articles/fake-news-comes-to-academia-1538520950 https://web.archive.org/web/20181003015636/https://www.wsj.c...
- eesmith 7y agoAs I recall, that wasn't quite the case. It was a highly edited version of Mein Kampf. Quoting https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_hoax https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_hoax : > Affilia put out a statement in response, noting, "The article does not espouse racism, anti-Semitism, or any other fascist ideology; the parallels to Mein Kampf were limited exclusively to word choice in the descriptive text." ... > David Banks compared the article's text to that of the Mein Kampf chapter it was supposedly based on and "couldn’t find a single phrase that matched." He also pointed out that the message of the hoax article was quite different from that of Mein Kampf: "This isn’t an article demanding concentration camps for men, it’s just a pedantic argument about neoliberalism."